Foto: Cybi

Fotos: Cybi ... (nicht zu verwechseln mit Seibi*....... 2 be continued,....)
So,... Drummle-Stägge,...resp. Piccolo verstaue,...joo no yfette,... und e weeneli pfuuse,...au wenn me am liebschte garad duuremache möcht...

(*by trans)

Fotos: Cybi


um die -4 Grad und Sternenhimmel ....s'isch scheeeen gsi. ;-)

"Totché" resp. "Touètché" oder auch Gâteau de St.Martin genannt - eine jurassische Spezialität:

Für den Teig:
2 dl Milch
15 Gramm Hefe
20 Gramm Butter
300 Gramm Mehl
1/2 Teelöffel Salz

Teig zugedeckt ruhen lassen bis sich das Teig-Volumen verdoppelt hat.

Aufguss:
2 dl Vollrahm (oder Doppelrahm)
1,5 dl Sauerrahm --- (Rahm-Sauerrahm-Verhältnis kann nach Geschmack variiert werden.)
1 Ei
1/2 Teelöffel Salz

Kuchenblech mit Teig auskleiden und einen Teigrand formen. Aufguss über dem Teig verteilen.Für 20 Minuten bei 250 Grad in den Ofen schieben. Ein Schälchen gefüllt mit Wasser mit in den Ofen stellen. (Dadurch wird der Teig nicht hart.)

Aus der Beilage der Basler Zeitung zur Fasnacht '04 - Wenns am Mäntig Vieri schloot: "Kai Blatt vors Muul":
D'Hyylgschicht - La Storia Lacrima - The Cry Story - Die Weingeschichte - L'Histoire Du Vin

Im Bundeshaus in Bern gibt es viele grosse und kleine Cliquen, und ein Schyssdräggzygli mit sieben Mitgliedern, die dazu verdonnert werden, Geselligkeit zu pflegen, die sie Konkordanz nennen. Das Schyssdräggziigli heisst «die Kompetänte», aber niemand weiss warum.

Über hundert Jahre lang war es ein reiner Männerverein, der sich vor Frauen in den eigenen Reihen hütete. «Frauen sind da zum Goschdym nähen, Mehlsuppekochen und auf den Tambouren-Nachwuchs aufzupassen», brüsteten sich die Mannen verächtlich. Darauf schlugen ihnen ein paar Frauen vor, ihr Schyssdräggziigli in «VKB» umzutaufen (Verein kleinbürgerlicher Bundesräte).

Eines Tages aber tauchte eine schöne Blondine auf, die die Männerherzen fast dahinschmelzen liess, aber eben nur fast, ..... weiterlesen
[Via: www.baz.ch/fasnacht/ ]

Anlässlich des O'Reilly Digital Democracy Teach-In (vom 9.Februar 2004) diskutierten Dan Gillmor, Jeff Jarvis and Jay Rosen über "Gatekeepers No More" - resp. die Rolle der Journalisten im Wandel:
"Journalists think … we need to give people information so they can participate. But it is more likely that if people participate they will seek information. … Activity comes first, and journalists in this country made a big mistake long time ago when without realizing it they began not to care if people got engaged with the information, they cared only if they received the information.

This is a key concept that must be understood by newspapers, and especially by newspaper editors, if they are to retain their community relevance and authority. Interest is directly relational to involvement. Journalists need to follow more than lead. Truly listen to your community, and the content that will engage them will be clear.

Die transscribierte Präsentation gibt's hier.

Interessant in diesem Zusammmenhang auch der Kommentar von Tom Mangan, der wichtige Punkte ins richtige Licht rückt:

Nobody's listening to this stuff except other people like me, and like them. It's the echosphere of the blogosphere.

The echo is constant: the people who edit the news we consume are dullards who cannot see the wonder of blogs. They are blind to the magic of participatory journalism, the nirvana of two-way communication between newsies and their audience. (....)

In our preoccupation with the "out there" audience we've forgotten the "in here" one. You know, the people we keep telling, "wake up and listen to us, we get it." How come they haven't glommed onto the fact that blogs represent a logical online-news distribution model? I think it's because instead of talking to them, we've been talking to ourselves. We've been big on telling them to listen up, but have we been listening to them?

There is a deep, abiding resistance to blogging in most newsrooms, and it's something beyond the aversion to change. (....) In any case, if we want blogging to gain traction in newsrooms, we have to go deeper than the "they don't get it" bit that's sustained us thus far. The "out there" audience knows what's wrong but is powerless to fix it. The "in here" audience has suspicions of its own. They're not the only ones who have to listen up.
[Via PrintsTheChaff ]

Woher allerdings der rosarote Himmel auf dem Bild herkommt,....its mir ein Rätsel ;-)

Some people regard the weblog as the first truly native form of Web content creation. And I said that might be true, but that weblogs hadn't yet created a commercial engine underneath them. I said they were populated by a mostly passionate group of amateurs. And there's nothing wrong with that, but in order for a medium to take off, it needs to have a group of professionals who are compensated and a business model underneath that can support that professional class. And what I was saying is that we may be on the cusp of that happening.
Martin Nisenholtz, CEO of New York Times Digital in einem Interview mit MediaPost: Q&A: Martin Nisenholtz

....dachte zuerst, es sei eindeutig an der Zeit in die Ferien zu gehen,....jetzt wackelt schon der Boden...

Sehr empfehlenswert - Tom Mangans Weblog über die Zeitungs-Arbeit:
I'm the one to blame for this mess. If you're a newspaper editor or anybody else in the news biz you're apt to find interesting stuff. If you're a media critic you might glean insight into the thought processes of a working newspaperman.
PJNet hat ein Interview mit Tom Mangan zum Thema "Will Weblogs Make Copy Editors Obsolete?" geführt:

We have to be zealous in insisting we are the guardians of the newspaper's credibility, which is a kind of capital equipment we can't afford to squander. If we tell ourselves that blogs and other online chores are somebody else's job, that's what they'll become, but if all the news is online in the future, we won't be part of it.
[Via: PJNet und Prints the Chaff ]

....früsch uss em Gaarte. (Frisch aus dem Garten) ;-)

Das World Editors Forum, Teil der World Association of Newspapers führt nun auch ein Weblog:
"editorsweblog.org - Practical issues and real solutions for working editors and senior newsroom executives"
Einzelne Rubriken sind u.A:
* Tabloid vs. broadsheet
* Converged or diverged? The multiplatform newsroom
* Is blogging journalism? How newspapers use the bloggers
* New readers: how to involve them
* What is newsworthy or how to reshape the future of the newspaper

Bisher ist das Ganze noch eher mager, wie Steve Yelvington bemerkt:

The aim, writes WEF director Bertrand Pecquerie, is "a cooperative weblog and a real international forum." WEF board members are supposed to be posting, but at this point -- admittedly, this is a new site -- Pecquerie seems to be the only one. And, curiously, readers are not invited to reply to the postings. As a result, it seems to me to be an old-style journalism effort that doesn't tap the potential of conversation within a broad-based community of editors.
http://wef.blogs.com/editors/

Das "life"-Weblog zur Poynter.org-Veranstaltung, Convergence Journalism for College Educators (N301):

This blog is originating from St. Petersburg, Florida, where journalism educators are discussing how they might teach journalism in a converged environment. It is being posted February 8-13 so our students, bosses, spouses and signicant others know we're working, not getting a tan.
http://convergedoyster.blogspot.com/