CyberWriter (Alles fliesst und nichts bleibt (Heraklit von Ephesos)) : Kommentare

GUGUCK

piccolomini — 2011-05-21T15:59:25Z

Sali Marie, wie gohts denn Dir ?

Danggscheen

piccolomini — 2011-05-21T15:40:39Z

fir das wirgglig scheen fasnächtlig Kaleidoskop !

Von hochgelagerten Füssen und Deckengucken

Cyberwriter — 2011-03-01T12:49:00Z

...

Aha,

boomerang — 2011-02-13T20:59:54Z

Aha,

huhuu

irgendeinisch — 2011-02-13T18:11:24Z

huhuu

Guguck ....

Cyberwriter — 2011-02-13T17:51:00Z

Guguck ....

"It’s the Journalism, Stupid — Not the Newspapers"

Cyberwriter — 2009-03-18T20:25:00Z

Via Pjnet.org auf einen äusserst interessanten Artikel von Clay Shirky gestossen:

Society doesn’t need newspapers. What we need is journalism. For a century, the imperatives to strengthen journalism and to strengthen newspapers have been so tightly wound as to be indistinguishable. That’s been a fine accident to have, but when that accident stops, as it is stopping before our eyes, we’re going to need lots of other ways to strengthen journalism instead.

When we shift our attention from ’save newspapers’ to ’save society’, the imperative changes from ‘preserve the current institutions’ to ‘do whatever works.’ And what works today isn’t the same as what used to work.

Und weiter:

Any experiment … designed to provide new models for journalism is going to be an improvement over hiding from the real, especially in a year when, for many papers, the unthinkable future is already in the past.

For the next few decades, journalism will be made up of overlapping special cases. Many of these models will rely on amateurs as researchers and writers. Many of these models will rely on sponsorship or grants or endowments instead of revenues. Many of these models will rely on excitable 14 year olds distributing the results. Many of these models will fail. No one experiment is going to replace what we are now losing with the demise of news on paper, but over time, the collection of new experiments that do work might give us the reporting we need.

Dem ist definitiv nichts hinzuzufügen ... Amen!

Vollständiger Artikel: Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable

A bad thing ;-)

Cyberwriter — 2009-03-16T15:35:00Z

Die New York Times forscht an der Zukunft der Zeitung: "Paper is dying, but it’s...

Cyberwriter — 2009-03-13T12:23:00Z

"Paper is dying, but it’s just a device" sagt Nick Bilton, an editor in the New York Times research and development lab.

Und weiter:

But don't all of those technology changes mean that newspapers will die?

Bilton thinks not, pointing out that in 1876 news accounts of the telephone predicted that concert halls and churches would be empty because of the new device, and a year later, predicted that the phonograph would kill the telephone and concerts, because people could choose when to listen.

"Newspapers and news organizations are not going anywhere," Bilton said. Except onto your phone, e-book reader, laptop and maybe even your shower wall.

Via: cyberjournalist.net resp. Wired Blog Epicenter: Times Techie Envisions the Future of News

What's that Twitter???

Cyberwriter — 2009-03-06T13:55:00Z

How Newspapers Tried to Invent the Web - But failed

Cyberwriter — 2009-02-27T13:43:00Z

Interessanter Artikel von Jack Shafer auf Slate: How Newspapers Tried to Invent the Web - But failed:

A moment of sympathy, please, for newspapers, whose readers and advertisers have been fleeing at a frightening rate. It would be easy to accuse editors and publishers of being clueless about the coming Internet disruption and to insist that the industry's proper reward for decades of haughty attitude, bad planning, and incompetence is bankruptcy.

und weiter ....

From the beginning, newspapers sought to invent the Web in their own image by repurposing the copy, values, and temperament found in their ink-and-paper editions. Despite being early arrivals, despite having spent millions on manpower and hardware, despite all the animations, links, videos, databases, and other software tricks found on their sites, every newspaper Web site is instantly identifiable as a newspaper Web site. By succeeding, they failed to invent the Web.

Via: Cyberjournalist.net

Back 2 the Roots

Cyberwriter — 2009-02-25T10:41:00Z

Moderne Medizin:

2000 B.C. - Here, eat this root.
1000 A.D. - That root is heathen. Here, say this prayer.
1850 A.D. - That prayer is superstition. Here, drink this potion.
1940 A.D. - That potion is snake oil. Here, swallow this pill.
1985 A.D. - That pill is ineffective. Here, take this antibiotic.
2000 A.D. - That antibiotic is artificial. Here, eat this root.

Via The Happy Hospitalist

Twitter hat Vogelgrippe

Cyberwriter — 2009-01-09T14:42:00Z

Nicht nachmachen !!

Cyberwriter — 2009-01-09T13:26:00Z

Via: KevinMD resp. Bad Medicine, Good Solution

Die Welt auf Schwäbisch ... ;-)

Cyberwriter — 2009-01-09T09:39:00Z

Was wäre, wenn? – Die Welt auf Schwäbisch
Vom YouTube-Kult zur eigenen Fernsehsendung

Hat Barack Obama Wurzeln in Reutlingen? Seit wann kann Merkel alles außer Hochdeutsch? Und: Warum war Yogi Löw bei der Fußball-EM mit seinem Tribünenplatz gar nicht so unzufrieden? Antworten auf diese drängenden Fragen gibt eine Sendung, die so im deutschen Fernsehen noch nicht zu sehen war: „Was wäre, wenn? – Die Welt auf Schwäbisch“. Überraschend und witzig werden hier Ausschnitte aus Nachrichten- und Unterhaltungssendungen, Talkshows, Dokumentationen, Serien und Spielfilmen schwäbisch vertont. Dabei werden auch die Inhalte neu aufgemischt – mit Themen von Kehrwoche bis altes „Glomp“ (schwäbisch für: „unnützes Zeug“).

Der Macher und Autor der Filme, Dominik Kuhn, spricht alle Stimmen von weiblich bis männlich, von jung bis alt selber. Im Internet ist er seit Jahren Kult. Weit mehr als zwei Millionen Mal wurde sein YouTube-Clip „Virales Marketing im Todesstern Stuttgart“ bisher angeklickt, in dem die „Star-Wars“-Helden Darth Vader und seine Getreuen schwäbelnd über die Vorteile neuer Werbekonzepte diskutieren. Der Südwestrundfunk (SWR) konnte Dominik Kuhn für sein erstes Fernsehprojekt gewinnen: Am 11. Januar 2009, um 21.15 Uhr präsentiert Moderator Malte Arkona im SWR Fernsehen das Ergebnis. Zum Beispiel Jan Hofer und die Tagesschau auf Schwäbisch – ein großer Spaß, vor allem, weil sich mit dem Dialekt auch die Inhalte ändern: Grund für eine Außenreparatur an der ISS (International Suabian Space Station) ist z. B. der verschmierte Schminkspiegel in der Damentoilette der Raumstation. Obamas Rede in Berlin wird zu einer gigantischen schwäbischen Hausbesitzerversammlung. Aus einem John-Wayne-Klassiker wird der neue Fernsehdreiteiler „Grüß Gott, Herr Cowboy“, in dem John Wayne – der Jockel – schwäbische Landeier ins Großstadtleben lotst. Die Neuvertonung ist dabei so professionell, dass man sich nicht mehr vorstellen kann, dass die Protagonisten der Filme ursprünglich einmal etwas ganz anderes gesprochen haben.

In Zeiten, in denen der Film „Willkommen bei den Sch’tis“ mit seinem Thema „Dialekt“ Millionen in die Kinos lockt, sucht auch das Fernsehen einen ungewöhnlichen und vor allem unterhaltsamen Zugang zur Mundart. „Was wäre, wenn? Die Welt auf Schwäbisch“ – eine überraschende Form von regionaler Unterhaltung. Die Redaktion der Sendung hat Klaus Herrberg.

Sendung: Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009, 21.15 bis 21.45 Uhr im SWR Fernsehen

Via: http://www.swr.de

King und co

Cyberwriter — 2009-01-06T16:41:00Z

Arrrrghhh !

Steigeisen schnallen!

Cyberwriter — 2008-12-31T09:40:00Z

... ein bisserl glatt heute ;-)

Frohe Festtage ;-)

Cyberwriter — 2008-12-24T10:09:00Z

find of the day!

nchenga — 2008-12-22T19:59:26Z

LOL

Nette Nachbarn

Cyberwriter — 2008-12-22T12:02:00Z

Via: The happy Hospitalist

Fishwrap und so weiter ....

Cyberwriter — 2008-12-16T17:54:00Z

"The newspaper business works much like an old-style manufacturing business where stories go from reporters to assigning editors to copy editors to layout editors with the final destination being the next day’s newspaper. A lot of thought and knowledge goes into the newspaper creation process, but it ends up getting thrown out, just like the daily paper.

Another area that newspapers spend a lot of time on is deciding what’s important and what’s not. At a major newspaper, this is more than 40-person hours a day of the most senior editors. This is conveyed in the newspaper by what page a story appears on, the position on the page and the size of the headline. Again, most of this information is lost by the time the story reaches online.

Of all the companies in the media business, newspapers have the strongest assets for capturing knowledge about current events. The type, quality and volume of original content they create is incredibly expensive to do. They just need to decide to move from the fishwrap business to the knowledge business."

Online Journalismus: Work in Progress

Cyberwriter — 2008-12-16T17:11:00Z

onlinejournalism is not just writing a webpage or filming a video;
it is commenting on a blog, or bookmarking a webpage.
That there are no walls in cyberspace, only links;
and that journalism lies in every act that you commit online.
You just need to make it visible.

Via: onlinejournalism blog

Der Click-Generator

Cyberwriter — 2008-12-16T10:48:00Z

Via: Zum runden Leder

Graue bleiche Lady

Ohnstein — 2008-12-08T23:34:07Z

Alles fliesst und nichts bleibt - vielleicht auch bei der New York Times. "The Old Gray Lady is looking a bit pale these days", sagt Jon Friedman von Marketwatch. Soeben hat sie eine 225-Mio-Dollar-Hypothek auf ihren stolzen Turm aufgenommen, an dem die Besitzer grad mal 52 Prozent halten. Um Schulden zu begleichen. Fast ein Wunder, dass so was noch klappt. Die Tribune Co., Herausgeberin der Chiago Tribune und der Los Angeles Times, der Baltimore Sun und vieler anderer Blätter ist eben bankrott gegangen und hat Gläubigerschutz beantragt. In den News Rooms wütet die Axt. Die Einnahmen sinken beängstigend. Da könnte bald einmal auch weniger Geld für den Online-Auftritt und die hübschen Extras zur Verfügung stehen. Condé Nast verzichtet schon darauf, für neuere Magazine eigene Websiten zu gründen. Man spart am Fleisch. Offenbar zeichnet sich ab, dass einige amerikanische Städte schon in wenigen Jahren keine lokale Zeitung mehr haben. Geniessen wir also noch die schönen Dinge im Web, solange es sie noch gibt.

NY-Times guckt über den Tellerrand ;-)

Cyberwriter — 2008-12-05T13:32:00Z

This new feature on NYTimes.com offers related links from other news sources and blogs around the Web. ...

Mehr: http://www.nytimes.com/marketing/timesextra/

Apropos Stere-o-ide, Doping und so ...

Cyberwriter — 2008-12-02T15:38:00Z

Wir wollen hier nicht pingelig sein, war bestimmt ein Tippfehler .... oder etwa doch nicht? NEIN, es hat System ;-) Guckst du hier

Rupert Murdoch: Moving beyond dead trees ...

Cyberwriter — 2008-11-20T14:32:00Z

A recent American study reported that many editors and reporters simply do not trust their readers to make good decisions. Let's be clear about what this means. This is a polite way of saying that these editors and reporters think their readers are too stupid to think for themselves.

By taking their audience for granted and allowing themselves to become as institutionalised as any government or company they write about, these journalists are threatening their own papers. It is simply extraordinary that so many who are privileged to sit in the front row and write the first account of history could be so immune to its obvious meaning—not to mention the consequences for their own industry.

Rupert Murdoch: Lecture 3: The future of newspapers: moving beyond dead trees

Via: Medienspiegel.ch

Der Mann schreibt mir von der Seele...

meckermann — 2008-11-19T09:27:41Z

Der Mann schreibt mir von der Seele...

Apropos Finanzkrise: "Is Blogging Keeping You Poor?"

Cyberwriter — 2008-11-19T09:08:00Z

Gelesen beim copyblogger:

Is Blogging Keeping You Poor? by Jonathan Morrow

"They’re laughing at us. Did you know that?

Right now, someone who refers to himself as an “Internet marketer” is sitting in his bedroom, dressed in nothing but his undies, laughing at how hard bloggers work for how little money we make.
We drive ourselves to creative exhaustion by expecting ourselves to pump out a never-ending stream of remarkable content — a stream that, even in the best of cases, only pulls in a couple hundred bucks a month in advertising revenue.

And the guy in his undies? He’s one of the thousands or even tens of thousands of people making six figures online every year. Sure, he worked hard in the beginning, but not anymore. Now he’s connected and focused on growing revenue, not creating an endless supply of free content.

Compare that story to that of most bloggers, and you have to laugh. To say we are overworked and underpaid is an understatement. The guy in his undies thinks this is especially funny, and justifiably so. He’s only half as smart as you, but he’s making 10 times more money. So he laughs, not just at you, but at all bloggers. All bloggers, that is, except a tiny handful that have figured out something that makes them wealthy ..."

Weiterlesen (via Copyblogger)

ja.

boomerang — 2008-11-18T16:59:11Z

ja.